Taxing capital income: a bad idea

Andrew Atkeson, Varadarajan Chari and Patrick Kehoe

Quarterly Review, 1999, vol. 23, issue Sum, 3-17

Abstract: Under a narrow set of assumptions, Chamley (1986) established that the optimal tax rate on capital income is eventually zero. This study examines and extends that result by relaxing Chamley?s assumptions, one by one, to see if the result still holds. It does. This study unifies the work of other researchers, who have confirmed the result independently using different types of models and approaches. This study uses just one type of model (discrete time) and just one approach (primal). Chamley?s result holds when agents are heterogeneous rather than identical, the economy?s growth rate is endogenous rather than exogenous, the economy is open rather than closed, and agents live in overlapping generations rather than forever. (With this last assumption, the result holds under stricter conditions than with the others.)

Keywords: Taxation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1999
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (169)

Downloads: (external link)
http://minneapolisfed.org/research/qr/qr2331.pdf (application/pdf)
http://minneapolisfed.org/research/qr/qr2331.html (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedmqr:y:1999:i:sum:p:3-17:n:v.23no.3

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Quarterly Review from Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kate Hansel ().