What drives productivity growth?

Kevin Stiroh ()

Economic Policy Review, 2001, issue Mar, No v.7 no.1, 37-59

Abstract: Economists have long debated the best way to explain the sources of productivity growth. Neoclassical theory and \\"new growth\\" theory both regard investment?broadly defined to include purchases of tangible assets, human capital expenditures, and research and development efforts?as a critical source of productivity growth, but they differ in fundamental ways. Most notably, the neoclassical framework focuses on diminishing and internal returns to aggregate capital, while new growth models emphasize constant returns to capital that may yield external benefits. This article finds that despite their differences, both theories help explain productivity growth. The methodological tools of the neoclassical economists allow one to measure the rate of technical change, and the models of the new growth theorists provide an internal explanation for technical progress.

Keywords: Productivity; Technology; Capital; Economic development (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2001
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (40)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/epr/01v07n1/0103stir.html (text/html)
https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/epr/01v07n1/0103stir.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fednep:y:2001:i:mar:p:37-59:n:v.7no.1

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Economic Policy Review from Federal Reserve Bank of New York Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Gabriella Bucciarelli ().