Should Philadelphia's suburbs help their central city?

Robert P. Inman

Business Review, 2003, issue Q2, 24-26

Abstract: We end with the age-old debate of city vs. suburbs. The United States is unique in its commitment to local government as the primary provider of essential public services and in its use of local taxes as the primary means for paying for these services. The Philadelphia metropolitan area is typical of the U.S. pattern. But Philadelphia faces the burdens and responsibilities of all older central cities, including a higher proportion of poor residents than its surrounding suburbs. Such circumstances lead the city to impose higher taxes, but raising revenues through higher taxes becomes self-defeating when tax rates drive people and businesses away. The result is a weaker city and regional economy. How can Philadelphia strengthen its finances? In \\"Should Philadelphia's Suburbs Help Their Central City?\\" Bob Inman proposes a targeted program of suburban assistance to lower the commuter wage tax and presents evidence that such a program is likely to benefit city and suburban residents alike.

Keywords: Philadelphia (Pa.); Cities and towns (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2003
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.philadelphiafed.org/-/media/frbp/asset ... 2003/q2/brq203ri.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedpbr:y:2003:i:q2:p:24-26

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this article

Business Review is currently edited by Becca Sells

More articles in Business Review from Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Beth Paul ().