EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

How much is that home really worth? Appraisal bias and house-price uncertainty

Leonard Nakamura

Business Review, 2010, issue Q1, 11-22

Abstract: With house prices often below the face value of mortgages these days, the expected return on many mortgages has tumbled, since one of the major forces supporting mortgages, the collateral, has weakened. One source of these mortgage problems has been the validity of the home appraisal, which is supposed to be an objective and expert dollar valuation of the house that should help make a mortgage less risky. Unfortunately, the appraisal process can go awry and often has. As Leonard Nakamura shows in this article, appraisals have been biased upward, making mortgages riskier. Now a reverse risk is at work: The bias is going the other way, causing home valuations to be underestimated, possibly making new mortgages harder to obtain. In addition to problems of bias, Nakamura discusses the appraisal process, how it's supposed to work, and how it can go awry.

Keywords: Prices; Real property; Housing; real estate investments (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.philadelphiafed.org/-/media/frbp/asset ... h-appraisal-bias.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedpbr:y:2010:i:q1:p:11-22

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this article

Business Review is currently edited by Becca Sells

More articles in Business Review from Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Beth Paul ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:fip:fedpbr:y:2010:i:q1:p:11-22