Economics at your fingertips  

The political economy of balanced budget amendments

Marina Azzimonti ()

Business Review, 2013, issue Q1, 11-20

Abstract: A balanced budget amendment is a constitutional rule requiring that the government collect enough revenue to finance its expenditures every year. The motivation for introducing such a rule is the desire to restrict deficit spending and limit increases in government debt. However, policymakers strongly disagree about the rule?s coverage and provisions. In particular, they disagree on how to define the terms revenue and expenditures and under which conditions exceptions to the rule should be allowed. In this article, Marina Azzimonti provides an overview of the arguments raised by proponents and opponents to the balanced budget amendment, emphasizing its economic consequences. She then describes recent findings in the academic literature that analyze the impact of similar rules at the state level. Finally, she summarizes theoretical findings that aim to compute the impact of a balanced budget rule on economic and policy variables, together with its effects on consumers? welfare.

Keywords: Debt - United States; Deficit financing; Budget - United States (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) ... udget-amendments.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this article

Business Review is currently edited by Becca Sells

More articles in Business Review from Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().

Page updated 2020-05-26
Handle: RePEc:fip:fedpbr:y:2013:i:q1:p:11-20