The Rise in Loan-to-Deposit Ratios: Is 80 the New 60?
James DiSalvo and
Banking Trends, 2017, issue Q3, 18-23
Liquidity ratios at small banks have climbed in recent decades. Why has this happened? Should regulators be concerned? A traditional signal that a bank may not have enough liquid assets to cover a sudden loss of funding has increased dramatically at small banks in recent decades. Small banks? median ratio of the value of their loans outstanding to the value of their deposits has risen from around 60 percent in the second half of the 1980s to around 80 percent today. Meanwhile, the same measure of liquidity has increased about 5 percentage points at large banks. How can we explain this big increase in loan-to-deposit (LTD) ratios among small banks? Are higher LTD ratios here to stay? Do they pose risks to the safety and soundness of our small banks?
Keywords: loans; LTD; loan to deposit ratio; liquid assets (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.philadelphiafed.org/-/media/research-a ... sit-ratios.pdf?la=en Full text (text/html)
Journal Article: The Rise in Loan-to-Deposit Ratios: Is 80 the New 60? (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedpbt:00005
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Banking Trends is currently edited by Becca Sells
More articles in Banking Trends from Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().