Mortgage reform and the countercyclical role of the Federal Housing Administration's mortgage mutual fund insurance
Brent C. Smith
Economic Quarterly, 2011, issue 1Q, 95-110
It has been 75 years since the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) was established and it is again serving as the primary backstop in the current housing market downturn, insuring roughly 39 percent of all new purchase loans. This countercyclical role for the FHA, with respect to the housing market cycle, does not come without costs, and the main cost is the risk of new lending in a market with declining house values. As current discussion on mortgage finance reform focuses on the role, or elimination, of the government-sponsored enterprises, the countercyclical future role of, and the level of reliance on, the FHA should be at the center of the debate.
Keywords: Mortgages; Housing; Financial market regulatory reform (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.richmondfed.org/publications/research/e ... 011/q1/pdf/smith.pdf (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedreq:y:2011:i:1q:p:95-110:n:v.97no.1
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Economic Quarterly from Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christian Pascasio ().