Controversy over the federal budget deficit: a theoretical perspective
Michael Dotsey
Economic Review, 1985, vol. 71, issue Sep, 3-16
Abstract:
Recently, the Office of Management and Budget projected that the fiscal 1985 federal budget deficit would exceed $200 billion and that out-year reductions would be gradual at best. These prospects have engendered a debate concerning the economic effects of government deficits and the attendant high level of government borrowing. In this article, Michael Dotsey investigates this topic theoretically using alternative macroeconomic models. Dotsey first examines a standard Keynesian model and finds that its prediction of a depressing future effect of government borrowing stems from its unrealistic view of the determinants of consumption. He then discusses the Ricardian equivalence idea that the economic effects are the same whether the government finances its expenditures by taxation or by borrowing. His discussion includes an evaluation of several objections that have been raised against Ricardian equivalence. Dotsey also suggests that one must estimate the optimal size of the government deficit as a necessary first step in evaluating current deficit levels.
Keywords: Budget; deficits (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1985
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/files/docs/publicati ... ev_frbrich198509.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedrer:y:1985:i:sep:p:3-16:n:v.71no.5
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Economic Review from Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christian Pascasio ().