Public Expenditure in Regions: Current State and Problems (Exemplified by Registries of Expenditure Commitments of the Regions in the Russian Far East)

Elena B. Veprikova () and Aleksei Novitskii
Additional contact information
Elena B. Veprikova: Eastern State Planning Center of the Ministry for the Development of the Russian Far East and Arctic, Khabarovsk 680000, Russian Federation

Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, 2021, issue 6, 117-131

Abstract: Exemplified by regions of the Russian Far East, the article presents a view on the current state and problems of managing regional public expenditures, including the focus of public expenditure on regional development. The research is based on the data from expenditure commitments registries in 2019. A major share of budget expenditures is “compulsory” (pre-determined) expenditures, which have limited flexibility and cannot be redirected to different purposes. Under these circumstances, the ability of regional governments to vary the direction of budget spending and finance self-initiated expenditure commitments—in other words, to independently manage the composition of expenditures—is kept to a minimum, which implies low autonomy in managing expenditures. Most of the Russian Far Eastern regions’ government expenditures are aimed at supporting the current volume and quality of public services. The share of developmental expenditures is higher in regions having more budget resources (Sakhalin Oblast), and significantly lower in regions of the northern Far East (Magadan Oblast, Kamchatka Krai, and Sakha Republic (Yakutia)), the latter having higher costs of supporting critical infrastructure under severe climate conditions. In the present situation, regional governments cannot be fully considered as key influencers managing the development of their territories, and only fill the role of executors and lobbying actors for acquiring financial support from the federal government. As a result, it is difficult to account for specific territorial circumstances and development potential, and the overall efficiency of government spending is decreased. In the authors’ opinion, the findings may be applicable to most regions in the Russian Federation.

Keywords: government spending; expenditure commitments; regional development; expenditure commitments registry; compulsory expenditures; initiative expenditures; developmental expenditures; microregion (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E62 H50 H61 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.finjournal-nifi.ru/images/FILES/Journa ... ii/06_6_2021_v13.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fru:finjrn:210606:p:117-131

DOI: 10.31107/2075-1990-2021-6-117-131

Access Statistics for this article

Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal is currently edited by Vladimir S. Nazarov

More articles in Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal from Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Gennady Ageev ().