QUALITATIVE ANSWERING SURVEYS AND SOFT COMPUTING
Antonio Morillas () and
Bárbara Díaz
Additional contact information
Bárbara Díaz: University of California at Berkeley
Fuzzy Economic Review, 2007, vol. XII, issue 1, 3-19
Abstract:
In this work, we reflect on some questions about the measurement problem in economics and, especially, their relationship with the scientific method. Statistical sources frequently used by economists contain qualitative information obtained from verbal expressions of individuals by means of surveys, and we discuss the reasons why it would be more adequately analyzed with soft methods than with traditional ones. Some comments on the most commonly applied techniques in the analysis of these types of data with verbal answers are followed by our proposal to compute with words. In our view, an alternative use of the well known Income Evaluation Question seems especially suggestive for a soft computing approach, since it would facilitate an empirical estimation of the corresponding linguistic variable adjectives. A new treatment of the information contained in such surveys would avoid some questions incorporated in the so called Leyden approach that do not fit to the actual world.
Keywords: Computing with words; Leyden approach; qualitative answering surveys (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G17 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fzy:fuzeco:v:xii:y:2007:i:1:p:3-19
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Fuzzy Economic Review from International Association for Fuzzy-set Management and Economy (SIGEF) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Aurelio Fernandez ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).