“ANTI-TURKISH EMBARGO”: WHO LOST THE MOST?

Natalia Shagaida

Russian Economic Development, 2016, issue 7, 36-42

Abstract: The ongoing ban on Turkish vegetables is hardly no ceable for the Russian citizens due to insignificant volumes of supplies. During the summer months, demand for this type of product will be met by domestic production and shipments from the EAEU partners – Armenia, Kazakhstan, and Kirgizia. The ban on shipments of tomatoes and cucumbers has produced diff erent results for Turkey. Exports of tomatoes as long-lived commodity were redirected to other countries. The producers of cucumbers have suffered considerable losses: exports have fallen by 40% (Russia’s share in Turkish export cons tuted 50%).

Keywords: Agricultural Industry; Russian Economy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q14 Q15 Q16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://iep.ru/files/RePEc/gai/recdev/recdev-2016-7-696.pdf Revised version, 2016 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gai:recdev:recdev-2016-7-696

Access Statistics for this article

Russian Economic Development is currently edited by Alexei Vedev

More articles in Russian Economic Development from Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Olga Beloborodova ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).