EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Arctic Sea Ice Decline and Geoengineering Solutions: Cascading Security and Ethical Considerations

Alec P. Bennett, Troy J. Bouffard and Uma S. Bhatt
Additional contact information
Alec P. Bennett: Center for Arctic Security and Resilience, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA
Troy J. Bouffard: Center for Arctic Security and Resilience, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA
Uma S. Bhatt: Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA

Challenges, 2022, vol. 13, issue 1, 1-18

Abstract: Climate change is generating sufficient risk for nation-states and citizens throughout the Arctic to warrant potentially radical geoengineering solutions. Currently, geoengineering solutions such as surface albedo modification or aerosol deployment are in the early stages of testing and development. Due to the scale of deployments necessary to enact change, and their preliminary nature, these methods are likely to result in unforeseen consequences. These consequences may range in severity from local ecosystem impacts to large scale changes in available solar energy. The Arctic is an area that is experiencing rapid change, increased development, and exploratory interest, and proposed solutions have the potential to produce new risks to both natural and human systems. This article examines potential security and ethical considerations of geoengineering solutions in the Arctic from the perspectives of securitization, consequentialism, and risk governance approaches, and argues that proactive and preemptive frameworks at the international level, and especially the application of risk governance approaches, will be needed to prevent or limit negative consequences resulting from geoengineering efforts. Utilizing the unique structures already present in Arctic governance provides novel options for addressing these concerns from both the perspective of inclusive governance and through advancing the understanding of uncertainty analysis and precautionary principles.

Keywords: geoengineering; securitization; ethics; climate change; arctic security; risk governance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A00 C00 Z00 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/13/1/22/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/13/1/22/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jchals:v:13:y:2022:i:1:p:22-:d:824187

Access Statistics for this article

Challenges is currently edited by Ms. Karen Sun

More articles in Challenges from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:13:y:2022:i:1:p:22-:d:824187