Air Quality Legislation in Australia and Canada—A Review

Shilpi Tewari (), Nidhi Pandey and Jierui Dong
Additional contact information
Shilpi Tewari: School of Property, Construction and Project Management, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia
Nidhi Pandey: Independent Researcher, Edmonton, AB T6E 4S4, Canada
Jierui Dong: School of Property, Construction and Project Management, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia

Challenges, 2024, vol. 15, issue 4, 1-20

Abstract: Air pollution is a pervasive global issue affecting human health, ecosystems, and the environment. This paper reviews the evolution and implementation of air quality legislation in Australia and Canada, providing a comparative analysis of their approaches to managing air pollution. Both countries have established robust legal frameworks to address air quality issues, involving governmental policies, regulatory mechanisms, and collaborative efforts among stakeholders. Australia began its air quality regulation at the state level in the 1950s, evolving into a national framework with the National Environment Protection Measure for Ambient Air Quality in 1998. In contrast, Canada centralized its efforts with the Clean Air Act in 1971, complemented by the National Air Pollution Surveillance program. Key findings reveal that, while both nations have achieved significant improvements in air quality, challenges remain in addressing the broader impacts of air pollution, such as climate change and health-related economic burdens. Australia’s air quality standards are generally more stringent than Canada’s for particulate matter but more relaxed for sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, and ozone. Both countries employ advanced air quality monitoring and reporting systems, with Australia’s Air Quality Index and Canada’s Air Quality Health Index providing critical public health information. The study highlights the need for continuous improvement and a more integrated approach to air quality management. By examining the legislative and regulatory landscapes of Australia and Canada, this paper offers valuable insights for other countries striving to enhance their air quality governance and mitigate the adverse effects of air pollution on a global scale.

Keywords: air quality policy; air quality management; air protection (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A00 C00 Z00 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/15/4/43/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/15/4/43/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jchals:v:15:y:2024:i:4:p:43-:d:1513513

Access Statistics for this article

Challenges is currently edited by Ms. Karen Sun

More articles in Challenges from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().