Greenwashing in the Tuna Industry: Implications for Consumers, Businesses and Planetary Health

Dan Daugaard (), Sana Ejaz and Ayobolawole Adewale Ogundipe
Additional contact information
Dan Daugaard: Tasmanian School of Business and Economics, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7005, Australia
Sana Ejaz: Tasmanian School of Business and Economics, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7005, Australia
Ayobolawole Adewale Ogundipe: Tasmanian School of Business and Economics, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7005, Australia

Challenges, 2025, vol. 16, issue 4, 1-19

Abstract: Greenwashing threatens both consumer trust and the integrity of planetary health initiatives. Transparency in sustainability claims is therefore critical for promoting ecological wellbeing, strengthening food security, and fostering equitable development in the Anthropocene. This paper investigates greenwashing by adapting the Gompers Governance Index methodology to the context of sustainability claims. The focus of our greenwashing index in this case is the sustainability claims made by canned tuna brands in Australia. The index is created from a comprehensive set of criteria for environmental claims, based on the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC)’s principles for trustworthy claims. We show that the canned tuna brands form two clusters: one at a very high level of achievement and a second group with notable opportunities to improve on their sustainability communication and transparency. The results also highlight several key issues, most notably a lack of information regarding future sustainability transition plans across most brands. A deeper analysis of the scoring scheme shows that the brands with third-party sustainability certification generally achieved a better alignment with the ACCC principles than other brands. Future iterations of this analysis could incorporate online transparency and third-party verification to provide a more comprehensive assessment. Overall, this study underscores the need for clearer sustainability messaging, greater regulatory enforcement, and improved accountability among brands to ensure consumers can make informed choices.

Keywords: planetary health; greenwashing; sustainability disclosure; sustainability index; ACCC principles; sustainable development goals (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A00 C00 Z00 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/16/4/45/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/16/4/45/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jchals:v:16:y:2025:i:4:p:45-:d:1761723

Access Statistics for this article

Challenges is currently edited by Ms. Karen Sun

More articles in Challenges from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().