EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Evaluation of the Use of Different Dedicated Mechanical Subcooling (DMS) Strategies in a Water Source Transcritical CO 2 Heat Pump for Space Heating Applications

Fernando Illán-Gómez (), José Ramón García-Cascales, Francisco Javier Sánchez-Velasco and Ramón A. Otón-Martínez
Additional contact information
Fernando Illán-Gómez: Departamento de Ingeniería Térmica y de Fluidos, ETSII, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, C/Dr Fleming s/n, 30202 Cartagena, Murcia, Spain
José Ramón García-Cascales: Departamento de Ingeniería Térmica y de Fluidos, ETSII, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, C/Dr Fleming s/n, 30202 Cartagena, Murcia, Spain
Francisco Javier Sánchez-Velasco: Departamento de Ingeniería Térmica y de Fluidos, ETSII, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, C/Dr Fleming s/n, 30202 Cartagena, Murcia, Spain
Ramón A. Otón-Martínez: Departamento de Ingeniería y Técnicas Aplicadas, Centro Universitario de la Defensa en la Academia General del Aire, C/López Peña s/n, 30720 San Javier, Murcia, Spain

Clean Technol., 2022, vol. 4, issue 4, 1-19

Abstract: In this work we analyze numerically different design configurations to be used in a R1234yf DMS cycle coupled with a water source, transcritical CO 2 heat pump for heating applications in the building sector. Specifically, we study the temperature range proposed by a European standard for heating with inlet/outlet water temperatures of: 30 °C/35 °C, 40 °C/45 °C, 47 °C/55 °C and 55 °C/65 °C. Moreover, 25 °C/30 °C is also analyzed which is the range expected for indoor swimming pool water pool heating applications. A water inlet temperature of 10 °C at the evaporator was considered in all of the cases. Results show that depending on the coupling strategy between the DMS cycle and the CO 2 heat pump, optimal COP values obtained can vary up to 30% whereas the optimal operating pressure of the CO 2 cycle can vary up to 8%. A configuration based on splitting the water flow to be heated into the DMS condenser and the gas cooler in a system with IHX was the best option for all the temperature ranges studied. The improvement in the maximum COP values obtained with this configuration ranges between 5% (for swimming pool applications) and 25% (for space heating with 40 °C/45 °C) when compared with the base cycle depending on the water temperature range considered. When this configuration is not considered, the basic transcritical CO 2 with IHX and without DMS was found the best option.

Keywords: water heater; transcritical cycle; heat pump; CO 2; DMS (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/4/4/74/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/4/4/74/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:4:y:2022:i:4:p:74-1226:d:976226

Access Statistics for this article

Clean Technol. is currently edited by Ms. Shary Song

More articles in Clean Technol. from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:4:y:2022:i:4:p:74-1226:d:976226