Comparative Life Cycle and Techno-Economic Assessment of Constructed Wetland, Microbial Fuel Cell, and Their Integration for Wastewater Treatment

Nicholas Miwornunyuie (), Samuel O. Alamu, Guozhu Mao, Nihed Benani, James Hunter and Gbekeloluwa Oguntimein ()
Additional contact information
Nicholas Miwornunyuie: School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
Samuel O. Alamu: Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Morgan State University, 1700 E Cold Spring Ln, Baltimore, MD 21251, USA
Guozhu Mao: School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
Nihed Benani: School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
James Hunter: Department of Civil Engineering, Morgan State University, 1700 E Cold Spring Ln, Baltimore, MD 21251, USA
Gbekeloluwa Oguntimein: Department of Civil Engineering, Morgan State University, 1700 E Cold Spring Ln, Baltimore, MD 21251, USA

Clean Technol., 2025, vol. 7, issue 3, 1-16

Abstract: This study systematically compares the environmental and economic performance of three wastewater treatment systems: constructed wetlands (CWs), microbial fuel cells (MFCs), and their integration (CW–MFC). Lab-scale units of each system were constructed using a multi-media matrix (gravel, zeolite, and granular activated carbon), composite native wetland species ( Juncus effusus , Iris sp., and Typha angustifolia ), carbon-based electrodes (graphite), and standard inoculum for CW and CW–MFC. The MFC system employed carbon-based electrodes and proton-exchange membrane. The experimental design included a parallel operation of all systems treating domestic wastewater under identical hydraulic and organic loading rates. Environmental impacts were quantified across construction and operational phases using life cycle assessment (LCA) with GaBi software 9.2, employing TRACI 2021 and ReCiPe 2016 methods, while techno-economic analysis (TEA) evaluated capital and operational costs. The key results indicate that CW demonstrates the lowest global warming potential (142.26 kg CO 2 -eq) due to its reliance on natural biological processes. The integrated CW–MFC system achieved enhanced pollutant removal (82.8%, 87.13%, 78.13%, and 90.3% for COD, NO 3 , TN, and TP) and bioenergy generation of 2.68 kWh, balancing environmental benefits with superior treatment efficiency. In contrast, the stand-alone MFC shows higher environmental burdens, primarily due to energy-intensive material requirements and fabrication processes. TEA results highlight CW as the most cost-effective solution (USD 627/m 3 ), with CW–MFC emerging as a competitive alternative when considering environmental benefits and operational efficiencies (USD 718/m 3 ). This study highlights the potential of hybrid systems, such as CW–MFC, to advance sustainable wastewater treatment technologies by minimizing environmental impacts and enhancing resource recovery, supporting their broader adoption in future water management strategies. Future research should focus on optimizing materials and energy use to improve scalability and feasibility.

Keywords: life cycle assessment; constructed wetland; microbial fuel cell; constructed wetland–microbial fuel cell (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/7/3/57/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/7/3/57/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:7:y:2025:i:3:p:57-:d:1698790

Access Statistics for this article

Clean Technol. is currently edited by Ms. Shary Song

More articles in Clean Technol. from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().