A Performance and Environmental Impact Study on a Combined Cycle Power Plant with a Bottoming ORC Unit

Dan-Teodor Bălănescu, Vlad-Mario Homutescu () and Marius-Vasile Atanasiu
Additional contact information
Dan-Teodor Bălănescu: Automotive and Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, “Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iași, 43 Dimitrie Mangeron Blvd., 700050 Iași, Romania
Vlad-Mario Homutescu: Automotive and Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, “Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iași, 43 Dimitrie Mangeron Blvd., 700050 Iași, Romania
Marius-Vasile Atanasiu: Automotive and Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, “Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iași, 43 Dimitrie Mangeron Blvd., 700050 Iași, Romania

Clean Technol., 2025, vol. 7, issue 4, 1-21

Abstract: The depletion of fossil fuel reserves and the pollution produced by fuel combustion are major concerns in the energy generation sector. Due to this, waste heat recovery has become a stringent objective in this domain. The current study pursues this objective with regard to gas–steam combined cycle power plants, which are currently viewed as the most advanced technology in fossil fuel power generation. The proposed solution for waste heat recovery is to add an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) power system to the gas–steam combined cycle power plant with a Solar Centaur 40 gas turbine, produced by Solar Turbines, a Caterpillar Company (San Diego, CA, USA). The ORC power system is placed along the path of the flue gas, downstream of the heat recovery steam generator of the combined cycle power plant. R1336mzz (Z), R1233zd (E), and R601a were investigated as working fluids. The performance of the ORC system was analyzed as a function of the degree of superheat. The superheating process was proven to be disadvantageous since it led to performance deterioration. The numerical study showed that the overall efficiency of the combined cycle power plant increased up to 0.014 (1.4%) as a consequence of adding the ORC system, which itself achieves a maximum efficiency of 0.133 (13.3%). The annual fuel (natural gas) savings achievable under these conditions were roughly estimated at 398,185 Nm 3 /year, equating to annual fuel cost savings of approximately 269,000 EUR/year and an 810 t/year reduction in CO 2 emissions.

Keywords: efficiency; energy recovery; organic Rankine cycle; superheating; waste heat (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/7/4/106/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/7/4/106/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:7:y:2025:i:4:p:106-:d:1807703

Access Statistics for this article

Clean Technol. is currently edited by Ms. Shary Song

More articles in Clean Technol. from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().