EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Dynamic Standing Exercise in a Novel Assistive Device Compared with Standard Care for Children with Cerebral Palsy Who Are Non-Ambulant, with Regard to Quality of Life and Cost-Effectiveness

Katarina Lauruschkus, Johan Jarl, Katharina Fasth Gillstedt and Åsa B. Tornberg
Additional contact information
Katarina Lauruschkus: Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, 22100 Lund, Sweden
Johan Jarl: Health Economics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, 22184 Lund, Sweden
Katharina Fasth Gillstedt: Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, 22100 Lund, Sweden
Åsa B. Tornberg: Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, 22100 Lund, Sweden

Disabilities, 2022, vol. 2, issue 1, 1-13

Abstract: Children with cerebral palsy who are non-ambulant cannot stand or walk independently. In Sweden, daily static standing is part of standard care for these children even though it is time-consuming and costly, and while it may benefit the well-being of many children, it is inconvenient for others. A novel stander enables dynamic standing through walking movements. The aim of this study was to compare dynamic and static standing regarding quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Twenty children with cerebral palsy who were non-ambulant were included in this randomized controlled study with a cross-over design. Mean age of the participants was 11.6 ± 3.6 years, nine were female. They participated in four months of static and four months of dynamic standing. Quality of life was assessed with the Caregiver Priorities and Child Health Index of Life with Disabilities (CPCHILD), which has been shown to be valid and reliable, and is tailored to children with severe cerebral palsy. Information about other aspects of quality of life and about cost-effectiveness was collected by study-specific questionnaires. Dynamic standing was the preferred alternative from the family perspective, as it cost less (€64, p < 0.01) and had greater benefits than standard (static standing) care. From societal and healthcare provider perspectives, dynamic standing had benefits but higher costs than static standing (€290 and €354 respectively, p < 0.01). These findings may contribute to the development of individualized standing recommendations.

Keywords: children; cerebral palsy; non-ambulant; standing exercise; quality of life; cost-effectiveness (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7272/2/1/6/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7272/2/1/6/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jdisab:v:2:y:2022:i:1:p:6-85:d:732424

Access Statistics for this article

Disabilities is currently edited by Ms. Cici Zhou

More articles in Disabilities from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jdisab:v:2:y:2022:i:1:p:6-85:d:732424