Is Benford’s Law a Universal Behavioral Theory?
Sofia Villas-Boas (),
Qiuzi Fu () and
George Judge ()
Additional contact information
Qiuzi Fu: National School of Development, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
George Judge: Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Graduate School, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
Econometrics, 2015, vol. 3, issue 4, 1-11
In this paper, we consider the question and present evidence as to whether or not Benford’s exponential first significant digit (FSD) law reflects a fundamental principle behind the complex and nondeterministic nature of large-scale physical and behavioral systems. As a behavioral example, we focus on the FSD distribution of Australian micro income data and use information theoretic entropy methods to investigate the degree that corresponding empirical income distributions are consistent with Benford’s law.
Keywords: first significant digits; Benford’s law; information theoretic methods; empirical likelihood; minimum divergence measure (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B23 C C00 C01 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C8 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Is Benford's Law a Universal Behavioral Theory? (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jecnmx:v:3:y:2015:i:4:p:698-708:d:57619
Access Statistics for this article
Econometrics is currently edited by Prof. Dr. Kerry Patterson
More articles in Econometrics from MDPI, Open Access Journal
Bibliographic data for series maintained by XML Conversion Team ().