Efficiency Comparison of Pro-Growth Poverty Reduction Spending before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Study of Regional Governments in Indonesia

Roosemarina Anggraini Rambe, Purmini Purmini, Armelly Armelly, Lizar Alfansi and Ratu Eva Febriani
Additional contact information
Roosemarina Anggraini Rambe: Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Bengkulu, Bengkulu 38371, Indonesia
Purmini Purmini: Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Bengkulu, Bengkulu 38371, Indonesia
Armelly Armelly: Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Bengkulu, Bengkulu 38371, Indonesia
Lizar Alfansi: Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Bengkulu, Bengkulu 38371, Indonesia
Ratu Eva Febriani: Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Bengkulu, Bengkulu 38371, Indonesia

Economies, 2022, vol. 10, issue 6, 1-14

Abstract: During the COVID-19 pandemic, all regions in Indonesia have had negative economic growth. It also increased the poverty rate in the country. The government must allocate pro-growth and poverty reduction programs to maintain economic growth and simultaneously reduce poverty. This study aims to measure the relative efficiency of pro-growth poverty reduction spending of local governments in seven regions in Indonesia. This study compares the efficiency scores before and during the COVID-19 pandemic from 2015 to 2019 and 2020. The inputs are five types of government spending: education, health, economic, social protection, and infrastructure. The outputs are economic growth and poverty reduction. Data envelopment analysis with an output-oriented model and a return to scale variable approach is applied. The results show that the highest average local government efficiency score was in Kalimantan, with the lowest being in Sulawesi. The efficiency scores of local governments in the COVID-19 pandemic differ between regions: it remained stable in Kalimantan, increased in Java-Bali, Sumatra, and Sulawesi, and experienced a decline in Nusa Tenggara, Maluku, and Papua. The study concludes that economic growth and poverty reduction can simultaneously measure government efficiency. To be relatively efficient, local governments need to consider allocating pro-growth poverty reduction spending to improve the conditions of both outputs.

Keywords: efficiency; spending on pro-growth poverty reduction; economic growth; poverty reduction; DEA; COVID-19 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E F I J O Q (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/10/6/150/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/10/6/150/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:10:y:2022:i:6:p:150-:d:842009

Access Statistics for this article

Economies is currently edited by Ms. Hongyan Zhang

More articles in Economies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().