A Game-Theoretic History of the Cuban Missile Crisis
Frank C. Zagare
Additional contact information
Frank C. Zagare: Department of Political Science, University at Buffalo SUNY, 504 Park Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA
Economies, 2014, vol. 2, issue 1, 1-25
Abstract:
This study surveys and evaluates previous attempts to use game theory to explain the strategic dynamic of the Cuban missile crisis, including, but not limited to, explanations developed in the style of Thomas Schelling, Nigel Howard and Steven Brams. All of the explanations were judged to be either incomplete or deficient in some way. Schelling’s explanation is both empirically and theoretically inconsistent with the consensus interpretation of the crisis; Howard’s with the contemporary understanding of rational strategic behavior; and Brams’ with the full sweep of the events that define the crisis. The broad outlines of a more general explanation that addresses all of the foundational questions associated with the crisis within the confines of a single, integrated, game-theoretic model with incomplete information are laid out.
Keywords: Cuban missile crisis; game theory; threat that leaves something to chance; metagame theory; theory of moves; analytic narrative (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E F I J O Q (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/2/1/20/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/2/1/20/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:2:y:2014:i:1:p:20-44:d:32375
Access Statistics for this article
Economies is currently edited by Ms. Hongyan Zhang
More articles in Economies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().