EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Energy Demand Comparison between Hollow Fiber Membrane Based Dehumidification and Evaporative Cooling Dehumidification Using TRNSYS

Jeachul Jang, Eun-Chul Kang, Hyung Keun Lee, Siyoung Jeong and Seong-Ryong Park
Additional contact information
Jeachul Jang: Energy Efficiency and Materials Research Division, Korea Institute of Energy Research (KIER), Daejeon 34129, Korea
Eun-Chul Kang: Energy Efficiency and Materials Research Division, Korea Institute of Energy Research (KIER), Daejeon 34129, Korea
Hyung Keun Lee: Climate Change Research Division, Korea Institute of Energy Research (KIER), Daejeon 34129, Korea
Siyoung Jeong: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sogang University, Seoul 04107, Korea
Seong-Ryong Park: Energy Efficiency and Materials Research Division, Korea Institute of Energy Research (KIER), Daejeon 34129, Korea

Energies, 2018, vol. 11, issue 5, 1-15

Abstract: This communication presents the performance evaluation and comparative study between two different techniques: a membrane-based dehumidification system (MDS) and evaporative cooling dehumidification (ECD) for a typical climate of South Korea. Although there are different ways to dehumidify the air in living and work spaces, the membrane-based dehumidification system (MDS) is the most effective way as it neither causes a change in the temperature nor harms the environment. Moreover, it consumes significantly less energy when compared to other methods. There are also limitations concerning products that are sensitive to temperature such as food and pharmaceutical products; the method of evaporative cooling dehumidification is not suitable for such applications. The present work demonstrated the excellent energy-saving performance of the membrane-based dehumidification system against evaporative cooling dehumidification by comparing the performance of these two systems during the rainy season using a transient system simulation. The results showed that the MDS helped to reduce the dehumidification load by more than 47.6% when compared to the ECD system, which is a significant achievement in this regard.

Keywords: membrane-based dehumidification system (MDS); hollow fiber membrane (HFM); evaporative cooling dehumidifier (ECD); TRaNsient SYStem simulation (TRNSYS); thermal comfort (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/5/1181/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/5/1181/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:5:p:1181-:d:145106

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:5:p:1181-:d:145106