EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Critical Resolution and Sample Size of Digital Rock Analysis for Unconventional Reservoirs

Tong Liu, Xu Jin and Moran Wang
Additional contact information
Tong Liu: Department of Engineering Mechanics and CNMM, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Xu Jin: National Energy Tight Oil & Gas Research Centre, Petroleum Geology Research & Laboratory Center, Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development (RIPED) PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China
Moran Wang: Department of Engineering Mechanics and CNMM, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Energies, 2018, vol. 11, issue 7, 1-15

Abstract: Digital rock analysis (DRA) has exhibited strong ability and significant potential to help people to image geological microstructures and understand transport mechanisms in rocks underground, especially for unconventional reservoirs like tight sandstone and shale. More and more new technologies have been developed for higher resolutions, which always come with higher expense. However, the balance between cost (money and time) and benefit has never been figured out quantitatively for these studies. As the cost and benefit are directly related to image resolution and size, this work is focusing on whether there is a critical resolution and sample size when using DRA for accurate enough predictions of rock properties. By numerically changing the digital resolutions of the reconstructed structures from high-resolution micro-computed tomography (CT) scanned tight rock samples, it is found that the permeability predictions get stable when the resolution is higher than a cut-off resolution (COR). Different from physical rocks, the representative element volume (REV) of a digital rock is influenced by the digital resolution. The results of pore-scale modeling indicate that once sample size is larger than the critical sample size and the scan resolution higher than the critical resolution for a given rock, the predicted rock properties by DRA are accurate and representative.

Keywords: digital rock analysis; unconventional reservoirs; scan resolution; representative element volume (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/7/1798/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/7/1798/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:7:p:1798-:d:156988

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:7:p:1798-:d:156988