A Review of Carbon Capture and Storage Project Investment and Operational Decision-Making Based on Bibliometrics

Jiaquan Li, Yunbing Hou, Pengtao Wang and Bo Yang
Additional contact information
Jiaquan Li: College of Resources and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100080, China
Yunbing Hou: College of Resources and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100080, China
Pengtao Wang: College of Resources and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100080, China
Bo Yang: College of Resources and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100080, China

Energies, 2018, vol. 12, issue 1, 1-22

Abstract: The research on carbon capture and storage (CCS) project planning and investment and operational decision-making can provide a reference for enterprises to invest in CCS and for policy-makers to formulate policies to promote CCS development. So what are the current research hotspots in this field and the gaps that still need to be further studied in the future? This paper reviews the research in the field by a bibliometric analysis. The results show that the research in this field first focus on cost analysis, followed by project investment evaluation, project planning (cost curve and pipeline network), and project operation. In particular, fossil fuel power plants, pipeline transportation, and oil fields are the most crucial objects in the three technical links of CCS projects, respectively. Policies, carbon pricing, and uncertainty in cost and benefits are factors that are mainly discussed in this field. The methods used for CCS project planning are cost curve model and optimization model. The real option approach is suitable for the evaluation of investment decision-making. The evaluation of operational decision is mostly based on optimization model. The future research directions can be summarized as five points: (1) continuously and systematically update the calculated costs in the current research to the unified price of the latest year; (2) calculate the cost curve from the perspective of emission sources; (3) expand the planning region of pipeline network to the country, continent, and even the entire world; (4) pay more attention to the investment assessment of the CCS project that may be implemented with low cost and high return; and (5) analyze the optimal operation mode of CCS in the low-load power system.

Keywords: CCS; project planning; investment and operational decision-making; review; bibliometrics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/1/23/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/1/23/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2018:i:1:p:23-:d:192468

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().