EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Research on Optimization Allocation Scheme of Initial Carbon Emission Quota from the Perspective of Welfare Effect

Qunli Wu () and Hongjie Zhang ()
Additional contact information
Qunli Wu: Department of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, 689 Huadian Road, Baoding 071000, China
Hongjie Zhang: Department of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, 689 Huadian Road, Baoding 071000, China

Energies, 2019, vol. 12, issue 11, 1-27

Abstract: The initial allocation of carbon emission quotas should be of primary concern when establishing China’s unified carbon emission trading market. Essentially, the issue of national carbon quota allocation is an allocation among China’s provinces. The novel bi-level allocation scheme that is based on weighted voting model is put forward, which divides allocation process into two levels, given that there are great regional differences in China. At the first level, k-means clustering is employed to cluster 29 provinces into four categories that are based on emission abatement responsibility, potential, capacity, pressure, and motivation. Subsequently, the national carbon quotas are allocated to the four classes. At the second level, carbon quotas of a class are allocated to each region in this class. The weighted voting models are constructed for the two levels, where each region selects their preferable scheme from three fundamental allocation schemes that are based on their voting rights. The comprehensive index method quantifies each region’s voting rights, which utilizes the information entropy method at the first level and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) at the second level. The carbon trading market is simulated and welfare effects obtained from carbon trading market under different allocation schemes are measured to verify the rationality of the proposed model. The results indicate: (1) the emission abatement burdens are borne by all provinces in China, but the burden shares are different, which are related to their respective carbon emission characteristics. (2) The differences in carbon intensity among regions in 2030 have narrowed on the basis of the results of 2005, which means that the proposed scheme can balance corresponding differences. (3) When compared with three fundamental allocation schemes, the bi-level allocation scheme can obtain the most welfare effects, while the differences in the welfare effect among regions under this scheme are the smallest, which indicates that the proposed model is feasible for policy-maker.

Keywords: carbon emission quota; bi-level allocation scheme; weighted voting model; welfare effect (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/11/2118/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/11/2118/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:11:p:2118-:d:236723

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Prof. Dr. Enrico Sciubba

More articles in Energies from MDPI, Open Access Journal
Bibliographic data for series maintained by XML Conversion Team ().

 
Page updated 2020-05-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:11:p:2118-:d:236723