Nuclear Magnetic Resonance T 1 – T 2 Spectra in Heavy Oil Reservoirs

Jiangfeng Guo, Ranhong Xie, Lizhi Xiao, Mi Liu and Lun Gao
Additional contact information
Jiangfeng Guo: State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
Ranhong Xie: State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
Lizhi Xiao: State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
Mi Liu: State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
Lun Gao: State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China

Energies, 2019, vol. 12, issue 12, 1-17

Abstract: Low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) has been widely used in the petroleum industry for reservoir evaluation. Fluid properties and petrophysical parameters can be determined from NMR spectra, obtained from processing echo data measured from the NMR tool. The more accurate NMR spectra are, the higher the reliability of reservoir evaluation based on NMR logging is. The purpose of this paper is to obtain more precise T 1 – T 2 spectra in heavy oil reservoirs, with focus on the T 1 – T 2 data acquisition and inversion. To this end, four inversion algorithms were tested on synthetic T 1 – T 2 data, their precision was evaluated and the optimal inversion algorithm was selected. Then, the sensitivity to various acquisition parameters (wait time and echo spacing) was evaluated with T 1 – T 2 experiments using a disordered accumulation of glass beads with a diameter of 45 μm saturated with heavy oil and distilled water. Finally, the sensitivity to various inversion parameters (convergence tolerance, maximum number of iterations and regularization parameter) was evaluated using the optimal inversion algorithm. The results showed that the inverted T 1 – T 2 spectra loss some relaxation information when the number of echo train is less than 7. The peak of the heavy oil signal gradually moves along the direction of increase in the T 2 and the intensity of the heavy oil signal gradually decreases with increasing echo spacing. The echo spacing should be as small as possible for T 1 – T 2 measurements in heavy oil reservoirs on the premise that the NMR instrument operates normally. A convergence tolerance that is too large or a maximum number of iterations that is too small may result in exiting the iteration prematurely during the inversion. A convergence tolerance of 1 × 10 − 7 and a maximum number of iterations of 30,000 are recommended for the inversion of the T 1 – T 2 spectra. An appropriate regularization parameter is an important factor for obtaining accurate T 1 – T 2 spectra from the optimal inversion algorithm.

Keywords: NMR; T 1 – T 2 spectra; heavy oil reservoirs; acquisition parameters; inversion parameters (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/12/2415/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/12/2415/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:12:p:2415-:d:242395

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().