EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

How Relevant Are Non-Use Values and Perceptions in Economic Valuations? The Case of Hydropower Plants

Sara Sousa, Anabela Botelho, Ligia Pinto and Marieta Valente ()
Additional contact information
Sara Sousa: Coimbra Business School/ISCAC and CERNAS, Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra, 3040-316 Coimbra, Portugal
Anabela Botelho: DEGEIT and GOVCOPP, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal

Energies, 2019, vol. 12, issue 15, 1-18

Abstract: The construction of hydropower plants, particularly of large ones, is far from being a consensual decision: advocates defend their construction based on the unquestionable benefits hydropower provides, while critics argue that these facilities are far from harmless and cause adverse impacts on the environment, being not only against the construction but also demanding the destruction of existing ones. We review a selection of recent empirical studies concerning impacts of hydropower developments, to make a case for the consideration of non-use values in the economic valuation of the environmental and social impacts of hydropower plants, through the use of non-market valuation methodologies. Additionally, we present data from a case study of hydropower economic valuation, where different subgroups of the population with differing degrees of contact and familiarity with hydropower rate their perception of impacts. Respondents with more contact are less penalizing of hydropower than other respondents. We conclude that non-use values are non-negligible and can be valued through stated preference methods, but researchers should take into consideration perceptions and the role of users and non-users. Non-use values should thus not be neglected by policy makers and regulators at the planning and public consultation stages or as part of the decommissioning decision.

Keywords: total economic value; hydropower plants; economic valuation; public perceptions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/15/2986/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/15/2986/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:15:p:2986-:d:254252

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Anna Xiao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2024-01-17
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:15:p:2986-:d:254252