Experimental and Simulation Studies on Adsorption and Diffusion Characteristics of Coalbed Methane

Donghyeon Kim, Youngjin Seo, Juhyun Kim, Jeongmin Han and Youngsoo Lee
Additional contact information
Donghyeon Kim: Department of Mineral Resources and Energy Engineering, Chonbuk National University, 567 Baekje-daero, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do 561-756, Korea
Youngjin Seo: Department of Mineral Resources and Energy Engineering, Chonbuk National University, 567 Baekje-daero, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do 561-756, Korea
Juhyun Kim: Department of Mineral Resources and Energy Engineering, Chonbuk National University, 567 Baekje-daero, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do 561-756, Korea
Jeongmin Han: Korea Gas Corporation, 638-1 Sangnok-gu, Ansan, Gyoggi-do 15328, Korea
Youngsoo Lee: Department of Mineral Resources and Energy Engineering, Chonbuk National University, 567 Baekje-daero, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do 561-756, Korea

Energies, 2019, vol. 12, issue 18, 1-16

Abstract: Coalbed methane (CBM) content is generally estimated using the isotherm theory between pressure and adsorbed amounts of methane. It usually determines the maximum content of adsorbed methane or storage capacity. However, CBM content obtained via laboratory experiment is not consistent with that in the in-situ state because samples are usually ground, which changes the specific surface area. In this study, the effect of the specific surface area relative to CBM content was investigated, and diffusion coefficients were estimated using equilibrium time analysis. The differences in adsorbed content with sample particle size allowed the determination of a specific surface area where gases can adsorb. Also, there was an equilibrium time difference between fine and lump coal, because more time is needed for the gas to diffuse through the coal matrix and adsorb onto the surface in lump coal. Based on this, we constructed a laboratory-scale simulation model, which matched with experimental results. Consequently, the diffusion coefficient, which is usually calculated through canister testing, can be easily obtained. These results stress that lump coal experiments and associated simulations are necessary for more reliable CBM production analysis.

Keywords: coalbed methane; gas content; diffusion coefficient; reservoir simulation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/18/3445/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/18/3445/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:18:p:3445-:d:264879

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().