Conceptualization of CO 2 Terminal for Offshore CCS Using System Engineering Process
Hyonjeong Noh,
Kwangu Kang,
Cheol Huh,
Seong-Gil Kang,
Seong Jong Han and
Hyungwoo Kim
Additional contact information
Hyonjeong Noh: Offshore Industries R&BD Center, Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering, Geoje 53201, Korea
Kwangu Kang: Offshore Industries R&BD Center, Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering, Geoje 53201, Korea
Cheol Huh: Ocean Science & Technology School, Korea Maritime and Ocean University, Busan 49112, Korea
Seong-Gil Kang: Global Cooperation Center, Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering, Daejeon 34103, Korea
Seong Jong Han: Offshore Industries R&BD Center, Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering, Geoje 53201, Korea
Hyungwoo Kim: Offshore Industries R&BD Center, Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering, Geoje 53201, Korea
Energies, 2019, vol. 12, issue 22, 1-18
Abstract:
In this study, the basic configuration and operation concept of a CO 2 terminal were identified by conducting a system engineering process. The performance goal of a CO 2 terminal was determined by requirement analysis. Then, functions and timelines were derived by functional analysis to meet the performance goal. Equipment to perform the functions were defined and finally, a process flow block diagram of the CO 2 terminal was acquired. The CO 2 terminal in this study consisted of three parts. First, the CO 2 loading/unloading part is responsible for liquid CO 2 unloading from the carrier and loading vapor CO 2 onto the carrier. Secondly, the liquid CO 2 transmission part extracts liquid CO 2 from the storage tanks and increases the pressure until it satisfies the offshore pipeline transportation condition. The vapor-treatment part collects boil-off gas, generates vapor CO 2 , and charges the storage tanks with vapor CO 2 to control the pressure of the storage tanks that discharge liquid CO 2 . Finally, the study results were compared with a liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal. The biggest difference between the CO 2 terminal in this study and the LNG terminal is that a vaporizer is essential in the CO 2 terminal due to the smaller storage capacity of the CO 2 terminal and, therefore, the lower amount of boil-off gas.
Keywords: CO 2 terminal; CO 2 storage tank; system engineering process; conceptual design; CO 2 loading/unloading (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/22/4350/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/22/4350/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:22:p:4350-:d:287258
Access Statistics for this article
Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao
More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().