EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Conceptualization of CO 2 Terminal for Offshore CCS Using System Engineering Process

Hyonjeong Noh, Kwangu Kang, Cheol Huh, Seong-Gil Kang, Seong Jong Han and Hyungwoo Kim
Additional contact information
Hyonjeong Noh: Offshore Industries R&BD Center, Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering, Geoje 53201, Korea
Kwangu Kang: Offshore Industries R&BD Center, Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering, Geoje 53201, Korea
Cheol Huh: Ocean Science & Technology School, Korea Maritime and Ocean University, Busan 49112, Korea
Seong-Gil Kang: Global Cooperation Center, Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering, Daejeon 34103, Korea
Seong Jong Han: Offshore Industries R&BD Center, Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering, Geoje 53201, Korea
Hyungwoo Kim: Offshore Industries R&BD Center, Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering, Geoje 53201, Korea

Energies, 2019, vol. 12, issue 22, 1-18

Abstract: In this study, the basic configuration and operation concept of a CO 2 terminal were identified by conducting a system engineering process. The performance goal of a CO 2 terminal was determined by requirement analysis. Then, functions and timelines were derived by functional analysis to meet the performance goal. Equipment to perform the functions were defined and finally, a process flow block diagram of the CO 2 terminal was acquired. The CO 2 terminal in this study consisted of three parts. First, the CO 2 loading/unloading part is responsible for liquid CO 2 unloading from the carrier and loading vapor CO 2 onto the carrier. Secondly, the liquid CO 2 transmission part extracts liquid CO 2 from the storage tanks and increases the pressure until it satisfies the offshore pipeline transportation condition. The vapor-treatment part collects boil-off gas, generates vapor CO 2 , and charges the storage tanks with vapor CO 2 to control the pressure of the storage tanks that discharge liquid CO 2 . Finally, the study results were compared with a liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal. The biggest difference between the CO 2 terminal in this study and the LNG terminal is that a vaporizer is essential in the CO 2 terminal due to the smaller storage capacity of the CO 2 terminal and, therefore, the lower amount of boil-off gas.

Keywords: CO 2 terminal; CO 2 storage tank; system engineering process; conceptual design; CO 2 loading/unloading (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/22/4350/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/22/4350/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:22:p:4350-:d:287258

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:22:p:4350-:d:287258