EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Comparison of LSSVR, M5RT, NF-GP, and NF-SC Models for Predictions of Hourly Wind Speed and Wind Power Based on Cross-Validation

Rana Muhammad Adnan, Zhongmin Liang, Xiaohui Yuan, Ozgur Kisi, Muhammad Akhlaq and Binquan Li
Additional contact information
Rana Muhammad Adnan: College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
Zhongmin Liang: College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
Xiaohui Yuan: School of Hydropower and Information Engineering, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
Ozgur Kisi: Faculty of Natural Sciences and Engineering, Ilia State University, Tbilisi 0162, Georgia
Muhammad Akhlaq: Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi 46300, Pakistan
Binquan Li: College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China

Energies, 2019, vol. 12, issue 2, 1-22

Abstract: Accurate predictions of wind speed and wind energy are essential in renewable energy planning and management. This study was carried out to test the accuracy of two different neuro fuzzy techniques (neuro fuzzy system with grid partition (NF-GP) and neuro fuzzy system with substractive clustering (NF-SC)), and two heuristic regression methods (least square support vector regression (LSSVR) and M5 regression tree (M5RT)) in the prediction of hourly wind speed and wind power using a cross-validation method. Fourfold cross-validation was employed by dividing the data into four equal subsets. LSSVR’s performance was superior to that of the M5RT, NF-SC, and NF-GP models for all datasets in wind speed prediction. The overall average root-mean-square errors (RMSE) of the M5RT, NF-GP, and NF-SC models decreased by 11.71%, 1.68%, and 2.94%, respectively, using the LSSVR model. The applicability of the four different models was also investigated in the prediction of one-hour-ahead wind power. The results showed that NF-GP’s performance was superior to that of LSSVR, NF-SC, and M5RT. The overall average RMSEs of LSSVR, NF-SC, and M5RT decreased by 5.52%, 1.30%, and 15.6%, respectively, using NF-GP.

Keywords: wind speed; wind power; forecasting; least square support vector regression; M5 regression tree; neuro-fuzzy system; Sotavento Galicia wind farm (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/2/329/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/2/329/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:2:p:329-:d:199540

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:2:p:329-:d:199540