Geomechanical Upscaling Methods: Comparison and Verification via 3D Printing

Lingyun Kong, Mehdi Ostadhassan, Siavash Zamiran, Bo Liu, Chunxiao Li and Gennaro G. Marino
Additional contact information
Lingyun Kong: Department of Petroleum Engineering, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA
Mehdi Ostadhassan: Department of Petroleum Engineering, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA
Siavash Zamiran: Marino Engineering Associates, Inc. St. Louis, MO 63117, USA
Bo Liu: Accumulation and Development of Unconventional Oil and Gas, State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base Jointly-Constructed by Heilongjiang Province and Ministry of Science and Technology, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163318, China
Chunxiao Li: Harold Hamm School of Geology and Geological Engineering, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA
Gennaro G. Marino: Marino Engineering Associates, Inc. St. Louis, MO 63117, USA

Energies, 2019, vol. 12, issue 3, 1-20

Abstract: Understanding geomechanical properties of rocks at multiple scales is critical and relevant in various disciplines including civil, mining, petroleum and geological engineering. Several upscaling frameworks were proposed to model elastic properties of common rock types from micro to macroscale, considering the heterogeneity and anisotropy in the samples. However, direct comparison of the results from different upscaling methods remains limited, which can question their accuracy in laboratory experiments. Extreme heterogeneity of natural rocks that arises from various existing components in them adds complexity to verifying the accuracy of these upscaling methods. Therefore, experimental validation of various upscaling methods is performed by creating simple component materials, which is, in this study, examining the predicted macroscale geomechanical properties of 3D printed rocks. Nanoindentation data were first captured from 3D printed gypsum powder and binder rock fragments followed by, triaxial compression tests on similar cylindrical core plugs to acquire modulus values in micro and macroscale respectively. Mori-Tanaka (MT) scheme, Self-Consistent Scheme (SCS) method and Differential Effective Medium (DEM) theory were used to estimate Young’s modulus in macroscale based on the results of nanoindentation experiments. The comparison demonstrated that M-T and SCS methods would provide us with more comparable results than DEM method. In addition, the potential applications of 3D printed rocks were also discussed regarding rock physics and the geomechanics area in petroleum engineering and geosciences.

Keywords: upscaling methods; geomechanical property; 3D-printed rocks; nanoindentation; Young’s modulus (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/3/382/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/3/382/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:3:p:382-:d:200748

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().