Performance Degradation of Surface PMSMs with Demagnetization Defect under Predictive Current Control
Lynn Verkroost,
Joachim Druant,
Hendrik Vansompel,
Frederik De Belie and
Peter Sergeant
Additional contact information
Lynn Verkroost: Electrical Energy Laboratory, Department of Electrical Energy, Metals, Mechanical Constructions and Systems, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
Joachim Druant: Electrical Energy Laboratory, Department of Electrical Energy, Metals, Mechanical Constructions and Systems, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
Hendrik Vansompel: Electrical Energy Laboratory, Department of Electrical Energy, Metals, Mechanical Constructions and Systems, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
Frederik De Belie: Electrical Energy Laboratory, Department of Electrical Energy, Metals, Mechanical Constructions and Systems, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
Peter Sergeant: Electrical Energy Laboratory, Department of Electrical Energy, Metals, Mechanical Constructions and Systems, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
Energies, 2019, vol. 12, issue 5, 1-20
Abstract:
To control the current of a surface mounted permanent magnet synchronous machine fed by a two-level voltage source inverter, a large variety of control algorithms exists. Each of these controllers performs differently concerning dynamic performance and control- and voltage quality, but also concerning sensitivity to demagnetization faults. Therefore, this paper investigates the performance degradation of three advanced predictive controllers under a partial demagnetization fault. The three predictive controllers are: finite-set model based predictive control, deadbeat control, and a combination of both previous algorithms. To achieve this goal, the three predictive controllers are first compared under healthy conditions, and afterwards under a partial demagnetization fault. A PI controller is added to the comparison in order to provide a model-independent benchmark. Key performance indicators, obtained from both simulations and experimental results on a 4 kW axial flux permanent magnet synchronous machine with yokeless and segmented armature topology, are introduced to enable a quantification of the performance degradation of the controllers under a demagnetization fault. A general conclusion is that the deadbeat controller shows superior control quality, even under partial demagnetization.
Keywords: deadbeat control; demagnetization; finite-set model based predictive control; permanent magnet synchronous machines; predictive control (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/5/782/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/5/782/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:5:p:782-:d:209271
Access Statistics for this article
Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao
More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().