Design Optimization of a Hybrid Steam-PCM Thermal Energy Storage for Industrial Applications

René Hofmann, Sabrina Dusek, Stephan Gruber and Gerwin Drexler-Schmid
Additional contact information
René Hofmann: Institute for Energy Systems and Thermodynamics, TU Wien, Getreidemarkt 9/BA, 1060 Vienna, Austria
Sabrina Dusek: Center for Energy, Sustainable Thermal Energy Systems, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Giefinggasse 2, 1210 Vienna, Austria
Stephan Gruber: Center for Energy, Sustainable Thermal Energy Systems, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Giefinggasse 2, 1210 Vienna, Austria
Gerwin Drexler-Schmid: Center for Energy, Sustainable Thermal Energy Systems, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Giefinggasse 2, 1210 Vienna, Austria

Energies, 2019, vol. 12, issue 5, 1-25

Abstract: The efficiency of industrial processes can be increased by balancing steam production and consumption with a Ruths steam storage system. The capacity of this storage type depends strongly on the volume; therefore, a hybrid storage concept was developed, which combines a Ruths steam storage with phase change material. The high storage capacity of phase change material can be very advantageous, but the low thermal conductivity of this material is a limiting factor. On the contrary, Ruths steam storages have fast reaction times, meaning that the hybrid storage concept should make use of the advantages and compensate for the disadvantages of both storage types. To answer the question on whether this hybrid storage concept is economically feasible, a non-linear design optimization tool for a hybrid storage system is presented. From a preliminary approximation, the results show that the costs of hybrid storage can be reduced, in comparison to a Ruths steam storage with the same storage capacity. Furthermore, a possible hybrid storage design for a real industrial implementation is discussed. Based on further analyses, it was shown that under certain conditions, the retrofitting of a conventional Ruths steam storage to a hybrid storage can be advantageous and cost-effective, compared to an additional Ruths steam storage.

Keywords: design optimization; investment costs; non-linear optimization; hybrid storage; phase change material; ruths steam storage; retrofitting solution (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/5/898/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/5/898/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:5:p:898-:d:212097

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().