Comparison of Different Hydraulic Fracturing Scenarios in Horizontal Wells Using XFEM Based on the Cohesive Zone Method

Jianxiong Li, Wen Xiao, Guanzhong Hao, Shiming Dong, Wen Hua and Xiaolong Li
Additional contact information
Jianxiong Li: Key Laboratory Deep Underground Science and Engineering, Ministry of Education, College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
Wen Xiao: Petroleum Engineering Technology Institute of Shengli Oilfield, Dongying 257000, China
Guanzhong Hao: Institute of Gas Recovering Technology in Changqing Oilfield Company Gas Production Plant NO.1, Yulin 718500, China
Shiming Dong: Key Laboratory Deep Underground Science and Engineering, Ministry of Education, College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
Wen Hua: Key Laboratory Deep Underground Science and Engineering, Ministry of Education, College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
Xiaolong Li: Sinopec Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, Beijing 100083, China

Energies, 2019, vol. 12, issue 7, 1-19

Abstract: Multistage hydraulic fracturing is a highly effective method for creating multiple transverse fractures to improve gas and oil reservoir production. It is critical to minimize the fracture spacing while also ensuring transverse propagation of fractures in multi-fractured horizontal wells. In this paper, a 3D fully coupled pore pressure-stress model based on the extended finite element method (XFEM) combined with the cohesive zone method is established to simulate five different fracturing scenarios in close spacing. The sensitivity of mesh size and the integration method are optimal, which are verified by the highly accurate traditional cohesive zone method. Then, the effect of five different fracturing scenarios on fracture geometries is compared. It is shown that spacing is a key parameter controlling fracture geometries in all fracturing scenarios. Alternative sequential and modified two-step fracturing can significantly reduce the influence of stress shadowing to generate more transverse fractures and form longer effective fractures. The sequential and two-step fracturing see an obvious improvement with increased fracture effective length when the spacing increases. The simultaneous fracturing technique can result in excessive closure of the middle fractures, which causes serious insertion of proppants. These results offer a new insight on optimization of hydraulic fracturing and can be a guidance for typical field cases.

Keywords: different fracturing scenarios; XFEM; cohesive zone method; close spacing; stress shadowing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/7/1232/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/7/1232/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:7:p:1232-:d:218629

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().