EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Optimal Allocation of Static Var Compensators in Electric Power Systems

Martin Ćalasan, Tatjana Konjić, Katarina Kecojević and Lazar Nikitović
Additional contact information
Martin Ćalasan: Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Montenegro, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro
Tatjana Konjić: Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Sarajevo, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosna and Herzegovina
Katarina Kecojević: Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Montenegro, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro
Lazar Nikitović: Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Montenegro, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro

Energies, 2020, vol. 13, issue 12, 1-24

Abstract: In the current age, power systems contain many modern elements, one example being Flexible AC Transmission System (FACTS) devices, which play an important role in enhancing the static and dynamic performance of the systems. However, due to the high costs of FACTS devices, the location, type, and value of the reactive power of these devices must be optimized to maximize their resulting benefits. In this paper, the problem of optimal power flow for the minimization of power losses is considered for a power system with or without a FACTS controller, such as a Static Var Compensator (SVC) device The impact of location and SVC reactive power values on power system losses are considered in power systems with and without the presence of wind power. Furthermore, constant and variable load are considered. The mentioned investigation is realized on both IEEE 9 and IEEE 30 test bus systems. Optimal SVC allocation are performed in program GAMS using CONOPT solver. For constant load data, the obtained results of an optimal SVC allocation and the minimal value of power losses are compared with known solutions from the literature. It is shown that the CONOPT solver is useful for finding the optimal location of SVC devices in a power system with or without the presence of wind energy. The comparison of results obtained using CONOPT solver and four metaheuristic method for minimization of power system losses are also investigated and presented.

Keywords: power system losses; SVC devices; wind energy; optimal location; CONOPT solver; metaheuristic methods (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/12/3219/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/12/3219/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:12:p:3219-:d:374391

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:12:p:3219-:d:374391