Hydrate Plugging and Flow Remediation during CO 2 Injection in Sediments

Jarand Gauteplass, Stian Almenningen, Tanja Barth and Geir Ersland
Additional contact information
Jarand Gauteplass: Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, 5007 Bergen, Norway
Stian Almenningen: Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, 5007 Bergen, Norway
Tanja Barth: Department of Chemistry, University of Bergen, 5007 Bergen, Norway
Geir Ersland: Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, 5007 Bergen, Norway

Energies, 2020, vol. 13, issue 17, 1-13

Abstract: Successful geological sequestration of carbon depends strongly on reservoir seal integrity and storage capacity, including CO 2 injection efficiency. Formation of solid hydrates in the near-wellbore area during CO 2 injection can cause permeability impairment and, eventually, injectivity loss. In this study, flow remediation in hydrate-plugged sandstone was assessed as function of hydrate morphology and saturation. CO 2 and CH 4 hydrates formed consistently at elevated pressures and low temperatures, reflecting gas-invaded zones containing residual brine near the injection well. Flow remediation by methanol injection benefited from miscibility with water; the methanol solution contacted and dissociated CO 2 hydrates via liquid water channels. Injection of N 2 gas did not result in flow remediation of non-porous CO 2 and CH 4 hydrates, likely due to insufficient gas permeability. In contrast, N 2 as a thermodynamic inhibitor dissociated porous CH 4 hydrates at lower hydrate saturations (<0.48 frac.). Core-scale thermal stimulation proved to be the most efficient remediation method for near-zero permeability conditions. However, once thermal stimulation ended and pure CO 2 injection recommenced at hydrate-forming conditions, secondary hydrate formation occurred aggressively due to the memory effect. Field-specific remediation methods must be included in the well design to avoid key operational challenges during carbon injection and storage.

Keywords: CCS; carbon storage; injectivity; hydrate formation; flow remediation; CO 2; CH 4 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/17/4511/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/17/4511/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:17:p:4511-:d:407008

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().