Environmental Impacts of Integrated Photovoltaic Modules in Light Utility Electric Vehicles
Olga Kanz,
Angèle Reinders,
Johanna May and
Kaining Ding
Additional contact information
Olga Kanz: IEK-5 Photovoltaik, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425 Jülich, Germany
Angèle Reinders: Energy Technology Group, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Johanna May: Institute of Electrical Power Engineering (IET), Cologne University of Applied Sciences, 50678 Cologne, Germany
Kaining Ding: IEK-5 Photovoltaik, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425 Jülich, Germany
Energies, 2020, vol. 13, issue 19, 1-14
Abstract:
This paper presents a life cycle assessment (LCA) of photovoltaic (PV) solar modules which have been integrated into electric vehicle applications, also called vehicle integrated photovoltaics (VIPV). The LCA was executed by means of GaBi LCA software with Ecoinvent v2.2 as a background database, with a focus on the global warming potential (GWP). A light utility electric vehicle (LUV) named StreetScooter Work L, with a PV array of 930 Wp, was analyzed for the location of Cologne, Germany. An operation time of 8 years and an average shadowing factor of 30% were assumed. The functional unit of this LCA is 1 kWh of generated PV electricity on-board, for which an emission factor of 0.357 kg CO 2 -eq/kWh was calculated, whereas the average grid emissions would be 0.435 kg CO 2 -eq/kWh. Hence, charging by PV power hence causes lower emissions than charging an EV by the grid. The study further shows how changes in the shadowing factor, operation time, and other aspects affect vehicle’s emissions. The ecological benefit of charging by PV modules as compared to grid charging is negated when the shadowing factor exceeds 40% and hence exceeds emissions of 0.435 kg CO 2 -eq/kWh. However, if the operation time of a vehicle with integrated PV is prolonged to 12 years, emissions of the functional unit go down to 0.221 kg CO 2 -eq/kWh. It is relevant to point out that the outcomes of the LCA study strongly depend on the location of use of the vehicle, the annual irradiation, and the carbon footprint of the grid on that location.
Keywords: life cycle assessment; CO 2 emissions; photovoltaic systems; electric vehicles; VIPV (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/19/5120/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/19/5120/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:19:p:5120-:d:422753
Access Statistics for this article
Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao
More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().