Spatial Energy Planning: A Review

Juan Carlos Osorio-Aravena, Marina Frolova, Julio Terrados-Cepeda and Emilio Muñoz-Cerón
Additional contact information
Juan Carlos Osorio-Aravena: Laboratorio Eco-Climático, Universidad Austral de Chile, Campus Patagonia, Coyhaique 5950000, Chile
Marina Frolova: Department of Regional and Physical Geography, Institute for Regional Development, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
Julio Terrados-Cepeda: Engineering Projects Area, Department of Graphic Engineering, Design and Projects, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain
Emilio Muñoz-Cerón: Engineering Projects Area, Department of Graphic Engineering, Design and Projects, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain

Energies, 2020, vol. 13, issue 20, 1-14

Abstract: Despite the fact that some renewable energy (RE) technologies are already techno-economically viable, the high spatial dilution nature of their sources, together with aspects beyond the techno-economic ones (such as environmental, social, cultural, and other aspects), can become strong constraints and barriers when it comes to their integration into electric systems. Therefore, with the objective of determining whether studies on spatial energy planning (SEP) are addressing these issues, a systematic review has been carried out to address whether SEP studies are considering aspects beyond the techno-economic ones when integrating RE technologies and, if they are being considered, how they are addressed in their analyses and what criteria, factors, and indicators of the aspects that are employed. Apart from the revelation that the concept of SEP has been included within high-quality scientific literature for less than ten years, SEP seems to be an unexploited tool with the potential to provide significant insight into a planning process that could prevent conflicts when integrating RE technologies into electric systems. This would be useful for decision-makers and for accelerating a sustainable energy transition.

Keywords: renewable energy; energy planning; planning tool; sustainability; environmental; social; decision-makers; sustainable energy transition (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/20/5379/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/20/5379/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:20:p:5379-:d:428551

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().