EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Reduced Model and Comparative Analysis of the Thermal Performance of Indirect Solar Dryer with and without PCM

Camilo Ramirez, Mario Palacio and Mauricio Carmona
Additional contact information
Camilo Ramirez: Rational Use of Energy and Environment Preservation Research Group, Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla 081007, Atlántico, Colombia
Mario Palacio: Processes Optimization Rational Energy Use and Biomass Research Group, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Montería 230003, Córdoba, Colombia
Mauricio Carmona: Rational Use of Energy and Environment Preservation Research Group, Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla 081007, Atlántico, Colombia

Energies, 2020, vol. 13, issue 20, 1-18

Abstract: A thermal model is proposed to analyze the performance of an indirect solar dryer (ISD) with latent heat storage using phase change material (PCM). The estimations are compared with experimental data presented in the scientific literature taken in real conditions. The validated thermal model is used in order to address a comprehensive analysis of the performance of the ISDs under the same operation conditions, the model is able to estimate the temperatures of glass cover, absorber plate, PCM, useful heat, thermal and storage efficiencies, and variables that are difficult to measure experimentally such as liquid fraction, heat losses, and accumulated energy of the ISDs. Three study cases are considered: Case 1 consists of two collectors with and without alternating nocturnal and diurnal operation (benchmarking case). Case 2 and 3 consist in a unique collector operating continuously for 24 h with PCM and without PCM, respectively. It was determined that the use of PCM in ISD increased the night thermal performance and extended the operational time of the system. On the other hand, results indicate that the use of two alternating collectors presents similar discharge behavior to using one collector with PCM operating continuously. Concerning the overall thermal performance, cases 1, 2, and 3 obtained thermal efficiencies of 20%, 28%, and 24%, respectively.

Keywords: PCM; thermal model; solar drying; FPSC (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/20/5508/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/20/5508/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:20:p:5508-:d:432071

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:20:p:5508-:d:432071