Renewable Energy Equivalent Footprint ( REEF ): A Method for Envisioning a Sustainable Energy Future

James Ward, Steve Mohr, Robert Costanza, Paul Sutton and Luca Coscieme
Additional contact information
James Ward: Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics (STEM), University of South Australia, Adelaide 5001, Australia
Steve Mohr: Research and Innovation Services, University of Newcastle, Newcastle 2308, Australia
Robert Costanza: Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University, Canberra 2601, Australia
Paul Sutton: Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University, Canberra 2601, Australia
Luca Coscieme: School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, D02 PN40 Dublin, Ireland

Energies, 2020, vol. 13, issue 23, 1-19

Abstract: We present an alternative approach to estimating the spatial footprint of energy consumption, as this represents a major fraction of the ecological footprint ( EF ). Rather than depicting the current lack of sustainability that comes from estimating a footprint based on uptake of carbon emissions (the method used in EF accounting), our proposed “Renewable Energy Equivalent Footprint” ( REEF ) instead depicts a hypothetical world in which the electricity and fuel demands are met entirely from renewable energy. The analysis shows that current human energy demands could theoretically be met by renewable energy and remain within the biocapacity of one planet. However, with current technology there is no margin to leave any biocapacity for nature, leading to the investigation of two additional scenarios: (1) radical electrification of the energy supply, assuming 75% of final energy demand can be met with electricity, and (2) adopting technology in which electricity is used to convert atmospheric gases into synthetic fuel. The REEF demonstrates that a sustainable and desirable future powered by renewable energy: (i) may be possible, depending on the worldwide adoption of consumption patterns typical of several key exemplar countries; (ii) is highly dependent on major future technological development, namely electrification and synthetic fuels; and (iii) is still likely to require appropriation of a substantial, albeit hopefully sustainable, fraction of the world’s forest area.

Keywords: ecological footprint; renewable energy; carbon emissions; biocapacity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/23/6160/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/23/6160/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:23:p:6160-:d:450063

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().