A Comprehensive Overview of Dynamic Line Rating Combined with Other Flexibility Options from an Operational Point of View
F. Gülşen Erdinç,
Ozan Erdinç,
Recep Yumurtacı and
João P. S. Catalão
Additional contact information
F. Gülşen Erdinç: Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Electric-Electronics, Davutpasa Campus, Yildiz Technical University, Esenler, Istanbul 34220, Turkey
Ozan Erdinç: Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Electric-Electronics, Davutpasa Campus, Yildiz Technical University, Esenler, Istanbul 34220, Turkey
Recep Yumurtacı: Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Electric-Electronics, Davutpasa Campus, Yildiz Technical University, Esenler, Istanbul 34220, Turkey
João P. S. Catalão: INESC TEC, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
Energies, 2020, vol. 13, issue 24, 1-30
Abstract:
The need for flexibility in power system operation gradually increases regarding more renewable energy integration, load growth, etc., and the system operators already invest in this manner to enhance the power system operation. Besides, the power system has thermally sensitive assets such as lines, transformers, etc. that are normally operated under highly conservative static ratings. There is a growing trend in this regard to use the actual capacity of such assets dynamically under varying operating conditions leading to a dynamic thermal rating concept which is referred as dynamic line rating (DLR) approach specifically for lines. This study provides a comprehensive overview of existing perspectives on DLR and combination with other flexibility options from an operational point of view. Apart from the existing review studies more focused on implementation category of DLR concept, the concentration on more operational stage from the power system operation point of view leads the difference of this study compared to the mentioned studies. A categorization of the DLR implementation for either being sole or combined usage as a flexibility option is further realized. Besides, a geographically categorized analysis on existing practical evidence on DLR concept and implementations is also presented in this study.
Keywords: dynamic line rating; flexibility; operational perspective; overhead lines (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/24/6563/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/24/6563/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:24:p:6563-:d:461070
Access Statistics for this article
Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao
More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().