Applying Artificial Intelligence to Predict the Composition of Syngas Using Rice Husks: A Comparison of Artificial Neural Networks and Gradient Boosting Regression

Hung-Ta Wen, Jau-Huai Lu and Mai-Xuan Phuc
Additional contact information
Hung-Ta Wen: Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung City 402, Taiwan
Jau-Huai Lu: Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung City 402, Taiwan
Mai-Xuan Phuc: Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung City 402, Taiwan

Energies, 2021, vol. 14, issue 10, 1-18

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to utilize two artificial intelligence (AI) models to predict the syngas composition of a fixed bed updraft gasifier for the gasification of rice husks. Air and steam-air mixtures are the gasifying agents. In the present work, the feeding rate of rice husks is kept constant, while the air and steam flow rates vary in each case. The consideration of various operating conditions provides a clear comparison between air and steam-air gasification. The effects of the reactor temperature, steam-air flow rate, and the ratio of steam to biomass are investigated here. The concentrations of combustible gases such as hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and methane in syngas are increased when using the steam-air mixture. Two AI models, namely artificial neural network (ANN) and gradient boosting regression (GBR), are applied to predict the syngas compositions using the experimental data. A total of 74 sets of data are analyzed. The compositions of five gases (CO, CO 2 , H 2 , CH 4 , and N 2 ) are predicted by the ANN and GBR models. The coefficients of determination (R 2 ) range from 0.80 to 0.89 for the ANN model, while the value of R 2 ranges from 0.81 to 0.93 for GBR model. In this study, the GBR model outperforms the ANNs model based on its ensemble technique that uses multiple weak learners. As a result, the GBR model is more convincing in the prediction of syngas composition than the ANN model considered in this research.

Keywords: biomass; gasification; steam-air updraft gasifier; rice husk; hydrogen production; artificial neural network; gradient boosting regression (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/10/2932/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/10/2932/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:10:p:2932-:d:557624

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().