EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Effect of the Preheated Oxidizer Temperature on Soot Formation and Flame Structure in Turbulent Methane-Air Diffusion Flames at 1 and 3 atm: A CFD Investigation

Subrat Garnayak, Subhankar Mohapatra, Sukanta K. Dash, Bok Jik Lee and V. Mahendra Reddy
Additional contact information
Subrat Garnayak: School of Energy Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur 721302, India
Subhankar Mohapatra: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur 721302, India
Sukanta K. Dash: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur 721302, India
Bok Jik Lee: Institute of Advanced Aerospace Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
V. Mahendra Reddy: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur 721302, India

Energies, 2021, vol. 14, issue 12, 1-24

Abstract: This article presents the results of computations on pilot-based turbulent methane/air co-flow diffusion flames under the influence of the preheated oxidizer temperature ranging from 293 to 723 K at two operating pressures of 1 and 3 atm. The focus is on investigating the soot formation and flame structure under the influence of both the preheated air and combustor pressure. The computations were conducted in a 2D axisymmetric computational domain by solving the Favre averaged governing equation using the finite volume-based CFD code Ansys Fluent 19.2. A steady laminar flamelet model in combination with GRI Mech 3.0 was considered for combustion modeling. A semi-empirical acetylene-based soot model proposed by Brookes and Moss was adopted to predict soot. A careful validation was initially carried out with the measurements by Brookes and Moss at 1 and 3 atm with the temperature of both fuel and air at 290 K before carrying out further simulation using preheated air. The results by the present computation demonstrated that the flame peak temperature increased with air temperature for both 1 and 3 atm, while it reduced with pressure elevation. The OH mole fraction, signifying reaction rate, increased with a rise in the oxidizer temperature at the two operating pressures of 1 and 3 atm. However, a reduced value of OH mole fraction was observed at 3 atm when compared with 1 atm. The soot volume fraction increased with air temperature as well as pressure. The reaction rate by soot surface growth, soot mass-nucleation, and soot-oxidation rate increased with an increase in both air temperature and pressure. Finally, the fuel consumption rate showed a decreasing trend with air temperature and an increasing trend with pressure elevation.

Keywords: CFD; flamelet; temperature; pressure; soot (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/12/3671/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/12/3671/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:12:p:3671-:d:578386

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:12:p:3671-:d:578386