Efficient and Robust Image Communication Techniques for 5G Applications in Smart Cities
Lavish Kansal,
Gurjot Singh Gaba,
Naveen Chilamkurti and
Byung-Gyu Kim
Additional contact information
Lavish Kansal: School of Electronics & Electrical Engineering, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara 144411, India
Gurjot Singh Gaba: School of Electronics & Electrical Engineering, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara 144411, India
Naveen Chilamkurti: Department of Computer Science and Computer Engineering, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3086, Australia
Byung-Gyu Kim: Intelligent Vision Processing Laboratory (IVPL), Department of IT Engineering, Sookmyung Women’s University, Seoul 04310, Korea
Energies, 2021, vol. 14, issue 13, 1-17
Abstract:
A wide range of multimedia applications must be supported by the modern fifth generation (5G) wireless communication systems for realizing the diverse applications in smart cities. The diverse applications such as real-time monitoring of roads, smart homes, smart industries, etc., for a sustainable smart city emphasizes a robust and efficient image transmission. In this paper, the influence of maximal ratio combining (MRC) on the reception of images with different orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) versions is studied. The different OFDM versions considered here are the fast Fourier transform (FFT) based OFDM and discrete cosine transform (DCT) based OFDM. A comparison between diverse modulation levels for the images transmitted through different OFDM methodologies, along with variation in a number of receiving antennas for MRC, is proposed for additive white gaussian noise (AWGN) and Rayleigh fading channels. The diverse modulation levels used are binary phase shift keying (BPSK), quadrature phase shift keying (QPSK), 8-PSK, and 16-PSK. The parameters that are used to compare different versions of OFDM for MRC antenna configurations are signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) vs. bit error rate (BER) and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) at the receiver as an estimation parameter for the received image quality.
Keywords: OFDM; DCT; FFT; MRC; BER; PSNR (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/13/3986/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/13/3986/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:13:p:3986-:d:587693
Access Statistics for this article
Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao
More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().