The Bright and Dark Sides of Energy Efficiency Obligation Scheme: The Case of Latvia

Andra Blumberga, Reinis Āzis, Dāvis Reinbergs, Ieva Pakere and Dagnija Blumberga
Additional contact information
Andra Blumberga: Institute of Energy Systems and Environment, Riga Technical University, Azenes Street 12/1, LV-1050 Riga, Latvia
Reinis Āzis: Institute of Energy Systems and Environment, Riga Technical University, Azenes Street 12/1, LV-1050 Riga, Latvia
Dāvis Reinbergs: Institute of Energy Systems and Environment, Riga Technical University, Azenes Street 12/1, LV-1050 Riga, Latvia
Ieva Pakere: Institute of Energy Systems and Environment, Riga Technical University, Azenes Street 12/1, LV-1050 Riga, Latvia
Dagnija Blumberga: Institute of Energy Systems and Environment, Riga Technical University, Azenes Street 12/1, LV-1050 Riga, Latvia

Energies, 2021, vol. 14, issue 15, 1-20

Abstract: Evidence collected by researchers over several decades suggests that the successful implementation of the Energy Efficiency Obligation Scheme (EEOS) may deliver significant, cost-effective energy savings over many years. However, before starting EEOS in Latvia, predictions by energy efficiency policy researchers envisaged that it is at high risk of savings shortfalls. This study aims to carry out an ex-post policy evaluation of EEOS in Latvia and assess its ability to deliver significant savings in the first phase of the new EEOS. This paper questions whether the new EEOS can reach savings goals without prior experience with voluntary agreement schemes and emulation of successful EEOS from other countries. The second goal of the research is to create a web-based optimization tool as an Interactive Learning Environment to help policymakers and EEOS-obliged parties to create goal-oriented strategies. The study has found that, contrary to expectations, Latvia has reached and even overfulfilled EEOS saving goals. Estimated cumulative savings obtained during the starting phase (329.2 GWh) are 68% higher than the cumulative savings planned by the policymakers for 2020 (234 GWh). This success is related to the enforcement of a stick-type approach in the policy. However, the study also revealed the dark side of EEOS implementation by discussing different types of energy efficiency measures applied by EEOS and the role of implementing and monitoring institutions. The ex-ante evaluation projected that 50% of the EEOS savings would be derived from information and education measures and 50% through contributions to the Energy Efficiency Fund or by implementing the most cost-effective energy efficiency measures. The ex-post evaluation shows that around 95% of savings are achieved through information measures and the rest by introducing energy efficiency measures on the consumer side. EEOS parties do not contribute to the Fund because the cost of information measures (on average 4 EUR/MWh) is significantly lower than the contribution to the Fund (70 EUR/MWh).

Keywords: energy efficiency obligation scheme; energy savings; energy efficiency; system dynamics; energy policy analyses (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/15/4467/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/15/4467/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:15:p:4467-:d:600379

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().