Simulation of Hydrogen-Air-Diluents Mixture Combustion in an Acceleration Tube with FlameFoam Solver

Mantas Povilaitis and Justina Jaseliūnaitė
Additional contact information
Mantas Povilaitis: Laboratory of Nuclear Installation Safety, Lithuanian Energy Institute, Breslaujos Str. 3, LT-44403 Kaunas, Lithuania
Justina Jaseliūnaitė: Laboratory of Nuclear Installation Safety, Lithuanian Energy Institute, Breslaujos Str. 3, LT-44403 Kaunas, Lithuania

Energies, 2021, vol. 14, issue 17, 1-13

Abstract: During a severe accident in a nuclear power plant, hydrogen can be generated, leading to risks of possible deflagration and containment integrity failure. To manage severe accidents, great experimental, analytical, and benchmarking efforts are being made to understand combustible gas distribution, deflagration, and detonation processes. In one of the benchmarks—SARNET H2—flame acceleration due to obstacle-induced turbulence was investigated in the ENACCEF facility. The turbulent combustion problem is overly complex because it involves coupling between fluid dynamics, mass/heat transfer, and chemistry. There are still unknowns in understanding the mechanisms of turbulent flame propagation, therefore many methods in interpreting combustion and turbulent speed are present. Based on SARNET H2 benchmark results, a two-dimensional computational fluid dynamics simulation of turbulent hydrogen flame propagation in the ENACCEF facility was performed. Four combustible mixtures with different diluents concentrations were considered—13% H 2 and 0%/10%/20%/30% of diluents in air. The aim of this numerical simulation was to validate the custom-built turbulent combustion OpenFOAM solver based on the progress variable model—flameFoam. Furthermore, another objective was to perform parametric analysis in relation to turbulent speed correlations and turbulence models and interpret the k-ω SST model blending function F1 behavior during the combustion process. The obtained results show that in the simulated case all three turbulent speed correlations behave similarly and can be used to reproduce observable flame speed; also, the k-ε model provides more accurate results than the k-ω SST turbulence model. It is shown in the paper that the k-ω SST model misinterprets the sudden parameter gradients resulting from turbulent combustion.

Keywords: premixed turbulent combustion; flame propagation; combustion solver; computational fluid dynamics (CFD); hydrogen safety (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/17/5504/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/17/5504/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:17:p:5504-:d:628565

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().