EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Biochemical Methane Potential of Swine Slaughter Waste, Swine Slurry, and Its Codigestion Effect

Anriansyah Renggaman, Hong Lim Choi, Sartika Indah Amalia Sudiarto, Andi Febrisiantosa, Dong Hyoen Ahn, Yong Wook Choung and Arumuganainar Suresh
Additional contact information
Anriansyah Renggaman: Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea
Hong Lim Choi: Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea
Sartika Indah Amalia Sudiarto: Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea
Andi Febrisiantosa: Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea
Dong Hyoen Ahn: GreenLabs, Seoul 05854, Korea
Yong Wook Choung: GreenLabs, Seoul 05854, Korea
Arumuganainar Suresh: Waste Management Unit, Suguna Foods Private Limited, Udumalaipettai 642126, India

Energies, 2021, vol. 14, issue 21, 1-14

Abstract: The codigestion of slaughter waste with animal manure can improve its methane yield, and digestion parameters; however, limited studies are available for the effectiveness of anaerobic codigestion using swine slaughter waste (SSW) and swine slurry (SS). Hence, this study was conducted to determine the characteristics of SSW and the effect of anaerobic codigestion with (SS) and explored the potential of CH 4 production ( M max ), the lag phase period (λ), and effective digestion time ( T eff ). SSW contains fat and protein contents of 54% and 30% dry weight within 18.2% of solid matters, whereas SS showed only 6% and 28% within 4.1% of solid matters, respectively. During sole anaerobic digestion, SSW produced a high M max (711 Nml CH 4 /g VS added ) but had a long duration λ (~9 days); whereas SS produced a low M max (516 Nml CH 4 /g VS added ) but had a shorter duration λ (1 day). Codigestion increased the M max from 22–84% with no significant T eff compared to sole SS digestion. However, the low M max of SS and high M max of SSW, resulted in a 7–32% decrease in M max at codigestion compared to SSW sole digestion. Codigestion improved the digestion efficiency as it reduced λ (3.3–8.5 days shorter) and T eff (6.5–9.1 days faster) compared to SSW sole digestion. The substrate-to-inoculum ratio of 0.5 was better than 1; the volatile solid and micronutrient availability may be attributed to improved digestion. These results can be used for the better management of SSW and SS for bio-energy production on a large scale.

Keywords: anaerobic digestion; swine slaughter waste; swine slurry; codigestion; CH 4 production; lag phase period (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/21/7103/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/21/7103/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:21:p:7103-:d:669602

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-18
Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:21:p:7103-:d:669602