Survey and Comparison of Optimization-Based Aggregation Methods for the Determination of the Flexibility Potentials at Vertical System Interconnections
Marcel Sarstedt,
Leonard Kluß,
Johannes Gerster,
Tobias Meldau and
Lutz Hofmann
Additional contact information
Marcel Sarstedt: Institute of Electric Power Systems, Electric Power Engineering Section, Leibniz Universität Hannover, 30167 Hanover, Germany
Leonard Kluß: Institute of Electric Power Systems, Electric Power Engineering Section, Leibniz Universität Hannover, 30167 Hanover, Germany
Johannes Gerster: Department of Computing Science, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany
Tobias Meldau: Institute of Electric Power Systems, Electric Power Engineering Section, Leibniz Universität Hannover, 30167 Hanover, Germany
Lutz Hofmann: Institute of Electric Power Systems, Electric Power Engineering Section, Leibniz Universität Hannover, 30167 Hanover, Germany
Energies, 2021, vol. 14, issue 3, 1-27
Abstract:
The aggregation of operational active and reactive power flexibilities as the feasible operation region (FOR) is a main component of a hierarchical multi-voltage-level grid control as well as the cooperation of transmission and distribution system operators at vertical system interconnections. This article presents a new optimization-based aggregation approach, based on a modified particle swarm optimization (PSO) and compares it to non-linear and linear programming. The approach is to combine the advantages of stochastic and optimization-based methods to achieve an appropriate aggregation of flexibilities while obtaining additional meta information during the iterative solution process. The general principles for sampling an FOR are introduced in a survey of aggregation methods from the literature and the adaptation of the classic optimal power flow problem. The investigations are based on simulations of the Cigré medium voltage test system and are divided into three parts. The improvement of the classic PSO algorithm regarding the determination of the FOR are presented. The most suitable of four sampling strategies from the literature is identified and selected for the comparison of the optimization methods. The analysis of the results reveals a better performance of the modified PSO in sampling the FOR compared to the other optimization methods.
Keywords: TSO/DSO-cooperation; DSO/DSO-cooperation; aggregation of flexibilities; feasible operation region; active distribution grid; hierarchical grid control; optimization-based sampling; PQ-flexibility area; equivalent PQ-capability; PQ-flexibility map (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/3/687/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/3/687/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:3:p:687-:d:489129
Access Statistics for this article
Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao
More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().