Comparison of Conventional and Variable Borehole Heat Exchangers for Use in a Desiccant Assisted Air Conditioning System

Finn Richter, Peter Niemann, Matthias Schuck, Jürgen Grabe and Gerhard Schmitz
Additional contact information
Finn Richter: Institute of Engineering Thermodynamics, Hamburg University of Technology, Denickestrasse 17, 21073 Hamburg, Germany
Peter Niemann: Institute of Engineering Thermodynamics, Hamburg University of Technology, Denickestrasse 17, 21073 Hamburg, Germany
Matthias Schuck: Institute of Geotechnical Engineering and Construction Management, Hamburg University of Technology, Harbuger Schlossstrasse 20, 21079 Hamburg, Germany
Jürgen Grabe: Institute of Geotechnical Engineering and Construction Management, Hamburg University of Technology, Harbuger Schlossstrasse 20, 21079 Hamburg, Germany
Gerhard Schmitz: Institute of Engineering Thermodynamics, Hamburg University of Technology, Denickestrasse 17, 21073 Hamburg, Germany

Energies, 2021, vol. 14, issue 4, 1-12

Abstract: The objective of this work is to analyze a gas injection borehole heat exchanger coupled with a desiccant assisted air conditioning system during cooling and heating operation. A common problem that occurs in air conditioning systems is peak loads, during which the cooling or heating power of the soil can be exceeded. To counteract this drawback, a gas injection borehole heat exchanger, which is capable of creating artificial groundwater flow along the heat exchanger by inducing a pressure difference inside the well, is used. Experimental results of the performance differences between a conventional and a gas injection borehole heat exchanger are presented. Under the same inlet conditions, a reduction in the outlet temperature of up to 2 °C is achieved compared with an equivalent conventional borehole heat exchanger in cooling mode. The maximum cooling power is increased by 26%. As a result, a fast and dynamic responding control of the heat transfer between the heat exchanger and the soil is possible. During winter operation, despite the lower drilling depth of the gas injection borehole heat exchanger system, the performance is within the range of a conventional system. The power increase is limited to around 0.2 kW th at a steady state. In conclusion, gas injection borehole heat exchangers can be promising in terms of reliable peak load handling within large geothermal fields.

Keywords: air conditioning; borehole heat exchanger; gas injection; peak load; experimental (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/4/926/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/4/926/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:4:p:926-:d:496909

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().