Estimating the Subsurface Thermal Conductivity and Its Uncertainty for Shallow Geothermal Energy Use—A Workflow and Geoportal Based on Publicly Available Data

Elisa Heim, Marius Laska, Ralf Becker and Norbert Klitzsch
Additional contact information
Elisa Heim: Applied Geophysics and Geothermal Energy, RWTH Aachen University, Mathieustr. 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
Marius Laska: Geodetic Institute and Chair for Computing in Civil Engineering & Geo Information Systems, RWTH Aachen University, Mies-van-der-Rohe-Str. 1, 52074 Aachen, Germany
Ralf Becker: Geodetic Institute and Chair for Computing in Civil Engineering & Geo Information Systems, RWTH Aachen University, Mies-van-der-Rohe-Str. 1, 52074 Aachen, Germany
Norbert Klitzsch: Applied Geophysics and Geothermal Energy, RWTH Aachen University, Mathieustr. 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany

Energies, 2022, vol. 15, issue 10, 1-19

Abstract: Ground-source heat pumps with borehole heat exchangers (BHE) are an efficient and sustainable option to heat and cool buildings. The design and performance of BHEs strongly depend on the thermal conductivity of the subsurface. Thus, the first step in BHE planning is often assisted by a map representing the thermal conductivity of a region created from existing data. Such estimates have high uncertainty, which is rarely quantified. In addition, different methods for estimating thermal conductivity are used, for example, by the German federal states, resulting in incomparable estimates. To enable a consistent thermal conductivity estimation across state or country borders, we present a workflow for automatically estimating the thermal conductivity and its uncertainty up to user-defined BHE lengths. Two methods, which assess the thermal conductivity on different scales, are developed. Both methods are (1) based on subsurface data types which are publicly available as open-web services, and (2) account for thermal conductivity uncertainty by estimating its lowest, mean, and maximum values. The first method uses raster data, e.g., of surface geology and depth to groundwater table, and provides a large-scale estimate of the thermal conductivity, with high uncertainty. The second method improves the estimation for a small, user-defined target area by calculating the thermal conductivity based on the available borehole data in that area. The presented approach’s novelty is a web-based geodata infrastructure that seamlessly connects data provision and calculation processes, with a geoportal as its central user interface. To demonstrate the approach, we use data from the federal state of Hamburg and compare the results of two target areas with the thermal conductivity estimation by the Geological Survey of Hamburg. Depending on the selected region, differences between the two estimates can be considerable (up to 1.2 W m − 1 K − 1 ). The differences are primarily due to the selection of the thermal property database and the consideration of wet and dry rock. The results emphasize the importance of considering and communicating uncertainty in geothermal potential estimates.

Keywords: geothermal potential mapping; borehole heat exchanger; GSHP; thermal conductivity; uncertainty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/10/3687/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/10/3687/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:10:p:3687-:d:818058

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().